2017 News

November 3, 2017

RSS


Queen Elizabeth II Cup (G1) - Data Analysis

Race to decide the autumn champion filly
The Queen Elizabeth II Cup is the pinnacle of autumn racing for fillies and mares aged 3 and up. In this clash between previous race winners and others aiming for their first title, runners backed as 6th favorite or lower have finished in the Top 2 in five of the last 10 years. Last year’s winner Queens Ring maintained good form after winning the Fuchu Himba Stakes, but the runner-up was the 12th favorite Sing with Joy. This year, then, we should again be wary of dark horses. But first, let’s look at some trends in this race from data over the last 10 years.

Check the performance by age
If we aggregate performances by runners over the last 10 years in terms of their age, we find that 3-year-olds have the highest Top 2 ratio, followed by 4-year-olds, while horses aged 5 and up have tended to struggle. Actually, two 5-year-olds have won this race – Queen Spumante in 2009 (11th favorite) and Rainbow Dahlia in 2012 (7th favorite) – and both were Kanto (Miho)-trained horses. [Table 1]

[Table 1] Performance by distance of the previous race (last 10 years)
Age Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
3 4-4-3-36 8.5% 17.0% 23.4%
4 4-3-6-42 7.3% 12.7% 23.6%
5 2-2-0-43 4.3% 8.5% 8.5%
6 0-1-1-12 0% 7.1% 14.3%
7 and up 0-0-0-6 0% 0% 0%

Also check performance by “favoritism”
In terms of the performance by favoritism over the last 10 years, the 1st favorites have the best record with a Top 3 ratio of 80.0%. The two 1st favorites beaten to 4th or lower had both most recently contested a Grade 2 race, in which they were backed among the top three favorites but finished 5th or lower. Of the 10 runners finishing 1st, 2nd and 3rd, respectively, seven of the 10 in each placing had been backed among the top four favorites. Turning next to the performance by win odds, the fact that runners backed by odds of “2.9 or lower” have achieved a Top 3 ratio of 100% should be worthy of attention. So, although dark horses are by no means rare, it would seem that the more highly favored horses are basically in the ascendancy. [Table 2] [Table 3]

[Table 2] Performance by favoritism (last 10 years)
Favoritism Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
1st favorite 2-4-2-2 20.0% 60.0% 80.0%
2nd favorite 1-2-3-4 10.0% 30.0% 60.0%
3rd favorite 2-1-0-7 20.0% 30.0% 30.0%
4th favorite 2-0-2-6 20.0% 20.0% 40.0%
5th favorite 0-0-2-8 0% 0% 20.0%
6th, 7th favorite 2-1-1-16 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
8th-10th favorite 0-0-0-30 0% 0% 0%
11th, 12th favorite 1-2-0-17 5.0% 15.0% 15.0%
13th favorite or lower 0-0-0-49 0% 0% 0%

 

[Table 3] Performance by win odds (last 10 years)
Win odds Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
2.9 or lower 2-2-2-0 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
3.0-4.9 1-4-1-3 11.1% 55.6% 66.7%
5.0-9.9 3-1-3-13 15.0% 20.0% 35.0%
10.0-19.9 2-1-4-21 7.1% 10.7% 25.0%
20.0-29.9 1-0-0-19 5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
30.0-49.9 0-0-0-21 0% 0% 0%
50.0-99.9 1-2-0-31 2.9% 8.8% 8.8%
100 or higher 0-0-0-31 0% 0% 0%

Pointers also seen in the performance by horse number
Looking into performances by horse number over the last 10 years, an unusual characteristic is that six of the 10 winners had been numbered “1-8,” eight of the 10 runners-up had been “9-18,” and seven of the 10 3rd-placed finishers had been “1-8.” These could be taken as useful statistics when planning bet formations. [Table 4]

[Table 4] Performance by horse number (last 10 years)
Horse number Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
1, 2 1-1-1-17 5.0% 10.0% 15.0%
3, 4 2-0-2-15 10.5% 10.5% 21.1%
5, 6 1-1-2-16 5.0% 10.0% 20.0%
7, 8 2-0-2-16 10.0% 10.0% 20.0%
9, 10 0-2-0-18 0% 10.0% 10.0%
11, 12 1-3-0-15 5.3% 21.1% 21.1%
13, 14 0-0-1-19 0% 0% 5.0%
15, 16 2-1-2-12 11.8% 17.6% 29.4%
17, 18 1-2-0-11 7.1% 21.4% 21.4%

Another trend in the performance by previous race
On aggregating performances by runners over the last 10 years in terms of their previous race, we find that the “Shuka Sho” has produced the most winners here (three). A runner most recently contesting an “Overseas G1 race” has won twice, but on both occasions it was the UK-trained Snow Fairy. As for the others, fillies coming straight from the “Fuchu Himba Stakes” have finished 1st and 2nd twice each, but their overall Top 3 ratio is only 12.3%. So, although the latter is positioned as the main prep race for the Queen Elizabeth II Cup, it seems to be no guarantee of success. By contrast, runners coming from “Other domestic G2 races” have posted better performances. In specific, five horses previously seen in the Sankei Sho All Comers have performed particularly well, with two wins and one runner-up spot. [Table 5]

[Table 5] Performance by previous race (last 10 years)
Previous race Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
Shuka Sho 3-3-3-25 8.8% 17.6% 26.5%
Domestic G1 in spring 0-0-1-3 0% 0% 25.0%
Overseas G1 2-0-0-3 40.0% 40.0% 40.0%
Fuchu Himba Stakes 2-2-4-57 3.1% 6.2% 12.3%
Other domestic G2 3-3-1-11 16.7% 33.3% 38.9%
Other domestic G3 0-1-0-6 0% 14.3% 14.3%
Overseas G2, G3 0-0-0-3 0% 0% 0%
Other races 0-1-1-31 0% 3.0% 6.1%

Look out for fillies with a poor G1 record in the same year
In the Queen Elizabeth II Cup over the last 10 years, one horse with experience of being beaten to “6th or lower in a G1 race in the same year” has finished in the Top 2 every year except 2011. It would be a good idea to check whether any runner with this kind of experience is contesting in this year’s race as well. [Table 6]

[Table 6] Top 2 finishers in the Queen Elizabeth II Cup G1 beaten to 6th or lower in a G1 race in the same year (last 10 years)
Finish Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
2007 2nd Fusaichi Pandora Victoria Mile 12th
2008 1st Little Amapola Shuka Sho 6th
2009 2nd T M Precure Tenno Sho (Spring) 18th
2010 2nd Meisho Beluga Takarazuka Kinen 6th
2012 1st Rainbow Dahlia Victoria Mile 12th
2013 1st Meisho Mambo Oka Sho 10th
2014 1st Lachesis Victoria Mile 15th
2015 2nd Nuovo Record Victoria Mile 6th
2016 1st Queens Ring Victoria Mile 8th
Note: When there is more than one race in question, the most recent one is shown.

Seek out the winner!
Four straight wins by horses ridden by the same jockey for at least the last four races

The last four winners of the Queen Elizabeth II Cup had been “ridden by the same jockey for at least the previous four races.” Of all graded races limited to fillies and mares, this is the second longest behind the Yushun Himba (Japanese Oaks). That may be why so much success is going to horses ridden by the same jockeys, giving them a better understanding of their horses’ characteristics which is crucial in a long-distance race. [Table 7]

[Table 4] Winning horses’ highest finish in a graded race in the previous four outings (last 9 years)
Year Winning horse Highest finish
2013 Meisho Mambo Koshiro Take From 4 races back
2014 Lachesis Yuga Kawada From 7 races back
2015 Marialite Masayoshi Ebina From 5 races back
2016 Queens Ring Mirco Demuro From 4 races back

(Yasunori Asano)

Queen Elizabeth II Cup (G1) related contents