2025 News

March 31, 2025

RSS


Osaka Hai (G1) - Data Analysis

Top middle-distance race of the spring season brings together runners with strong credentials
After achieving his first G1 victory in the 2024 Osaka Hai, Bellagio Opera went on to deliver another strong performance in his next race, finishing 3rd in the Takarazuka Kinen. Similarly, 2024 runner-up Rousham Park finished a close 2nd in the Breeders’ Cup Turf held in the autumn season of the same year, just a neck behind the winner. In other words, the Osaka Hai not only crowns the spring middle-distance champion, but this must-watch fixture also offers valuable insights into contenders for upcoming major races in Japan and overseas. Let’s now analyze some features shared by successful runners in this race based on results over the last 10 years, including the years through 2016—when the Osaka Hai was still held as a G2 race.

Top favorites are fairly reliable picks
Looking at performances by runners over the last 10 years in terms of favoritism, we find that runners backed as 1st, 2nd, and 4th favorite all achieved a Top 3 ratio of 60.0%. Although, runners backed as 3rd favorite struggled somewhat with a Top 3 ratio of 20%, top favorites should be rated accordingly. [Table 1]

[Table 1] Performance by favoritism (last 10 years)
Favoritism Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
1st favorite 2-2-2-4 20.0% 40.0% 60.0%
2nd favorite 4-1-1-4 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
3rd favorite 0-2-0-8 0% 20.0% 20.0%
4th favorite 2-1-3-4 20.0% 30.0% 60.0%
5th favorite 0-1-0-9 0% 10.0% 10.0%
6th-10th favorite 2-3-3-42 4.0% 10.0% 16.0%
11th favorite or lower 0-0-1-41 0% 0% 2.4%

Watch horses aged 5 or below
Looking at performances by runners over the last 10 years in terms of age, we observe that 28 of the 30 Top 3 finishers were aged 4 or 5. Meanwhile, runners aged 6 or above finished in the Top 3 only twice. This suggests that we should focus on relatively younger horses. [Table 2]

[Table 2] Performance by age (last 10 years)
Age Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
4 4-4-5-30 9.3% 18.6% 30.2%
5 6-5-4-37 11.5% 21.2% 28.8%
6 0-1-1-24 0% 3.8% 7.7%
7 0-0-0-13 0% 0% 0%
8 0-0-0-6 0% 0% 0%
9 0-0-0-2 0% 0% 0%

The bulk of the winners have started in Brackets 3-6
Looking at performances by runners over the last 10 years in terms of bracket number, we note that eight of the 10 winners started in Brackets 3-6. In addition, runners starting in Brackets 3-6 produced several 2nd and 3rd-place finishers. In other words, we should assume this race favors runners starting near the middle brackets. [Table 3]

[Table 3] Performance by bracket number (last 10 years)
Bracket number Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
1 0-2-0-12 0% 14.3% 14.3%
2 0-0-1-13 0% 0% 7.1%
3 2-2-1-12 11.8% 23.5% 29.4%
4 2-1-1-14 11.1% 16.7% 22.2%
5 2-1-2-14 10.5% 15.8% 26.3%
6 2-2-1-15 10.0% 20.0% 25.0%
7 1-1-3-15 5.0% 10.0% 25.0%
8 1-1-1-17 5.0% 10.0% 15.0%

Also check the closing speed in the previous race
Looking at performances by runners over the last 10 years by ranking in terms of the estimated time over the final three furlongs in their previous race, we find that runners that had been ranked 3rd or higher achieved a relatively strong Top 3 ratio. This suggests that top runners in terms of the estimated time over the final three furlongs in their previous race are likely to fare well in this race. [Table 4]

[Table 4] Performance by ranking in terms of estimated time over final three furlongs in previous race (last 10 years)
Estimated time over final
three furlongs in previous race
Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
1st 3-4-1-18 11.5% 26.9% 30.8%
2nd 1-2-3-13 5.3% 15.8% 31.6%
3rd 2-1-2-14 10.5% 15.8% 26.3%
4th 0-0-2-12 0% 0% 14.3%
5th 0-0-0-16 0% 0% 0%
6th or lower 3-2-2-33 7.5% 12.5% 17.5%
Note: Runners that contested a NAR or overseas race last time out have been excluded.

Seek out the winner!
Affiliation and finish in previous race also key points to watch

The last 10 winners were all Ritto-trained and had finished 7th or higher in their previous race. Other shared features among the 10 winners were that they were aged 5 or below and that they started in Brackets 3-8. Runners that fit these trends should therefore be considered leading contenders. [Table 5]

[Table 5] Winners’ affiliation, finish in previous race, age, and bracket number (last 10 years)
Year Winner Affiliation Finish in previous race Age Bracket number
2015 Lachesis Ritto 6th 5 3
2016 Ambitious Ritto 2nd 4 7
2017 Kitasan Black Ritto 2nd 5 4
2018 Suave Richard Ritto 1st 4 8
2019 Al Ain Ritto 5th 5 3
2020 Lucky Lilac Ritto 2nd 5 5
2021 Lei Papale Ritto 1st 4 6
2022 Potager Ritto 4th 5 4
2023 Jack d’Or Ritto 7th 5 5
2024 Bellagio Opera Ritto 2nd 4 6

 

(Masaya Ibuki)

Osaka Hai related contents