2026 News

May 4, 2026

NHK Mile Cup (G1) - Data Analysis

Notable performances by less-fancied runners
Over the last 10 years, runners backed as 6th favorite or lower have produced four winners and 16 Top 3 finishers, pointing to notable performances by less-fancied runners. Runners backed as 6th favorite or lower have also placed in the Top 3 every year. In particular, runners that finished 2nd to 5th in a graded race last time out have often performed well, which is worth bearing in mind. [Table 1]

[Table 1] Performance by favoritism (last 10 years)
Favoritism Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
1st favorite 1-2-1-6 10.0% 30.0% 40.0%
2nd favorite 4-2-0-4 40.0% 60.0% 60.0%
3rd favorite 0-2-1-7 0% 20.0% 30.0%
4th favorite 1-0-0-9 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%
5th favorite 0-0-0-10 0% 0% 0%
6th favorite or lower 4-4-8-113 3.1% 6.2% 12.4%

Runners starting in the outer brackets fare well
Over the last 10 years, runners starting in Brackets 1 to 4 have had low success ratios with performance of [1-4-5-70], corresponding to a Win ratio of 1.3% and a Top 2 ratio of 6.3%. Meanwhile, runners starting in Brackets 5 to 8, have delivered performance of [9-6-5-79], translating into a Win ratio of 9.1% and a Top 2 ratio of 15.2%. In particular, runners starting in Brackets 6 to 8 have performed exceptionally well, producing four winners each. Although the 1,600m turf course at Tokyo Racecourse is generally regarded as a course where the starting bracket is not a major factor, performance in the NHK Mile Cup shows clear differences by bracket number. [Table 2]

[Table 2] Performance by bracket number (last 10 years)

Bracket number
Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
1 0-1-0-19 0% 5.0% 5.0%
2 1-2-1-16 5.0% 15.0% 20.0%
3 0-1-3-16 0% 5.0% 20.0%
4 0-0-1-19 0% 0% 5.0%
5 0-3-3-14 0% 15.0% 30.0%
6 4-0-0-15 21.1% 21.1% 21.1%
7 1-2-0-27 3.3% 10.0% 10.0%
8 4-1-2-23 13.3% 16.7% 23.3%

Focus on runners coming from the Oka Sho or the Satsuki Sho
Looking at performances by runners over the last 10 years in terms of their previous race, we find that many runners came from the New Zealand Trophy (NHK Mile Cup Trial) or the Churchill Downs Cup (NHK Mile Cup Trial). However, the runners with high success ratios were those redirected here from the classic races (the Oka Sho [Japanese 1000 Guineas] or the Satsuki Sho [Japanese 2000 Guineas]). In particular, runners that had finished in the Top 5 of the Oka Sho or the Satsuki Sho delivered excellent performance of [4-2-0-3]. [Table 3]

[Table 3] Performance by major previous race (last 10 years)
Previous race Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
Oka Sho
(Japanese 1000 Guineas)
2-3-1-15 9.5% 23.8% 28.6%
New Zealand Trophy
(NHK Mile Cup Trial)
2-2-2-36 4.8% 9.5% 14.3%
Satsuki Sho
(Japanese 2000 Guineas)
2-2-0-9 15.4% 30.8% 30.8%
Falcon Stakes 2-0-2-21 8.0% 8.0% 16.0%
Churchill Downs Cup
(NHK Mile Cup Trial)
1-0-5-29 2.9% 2.9% 17.1%
Hochi Hai Yayoi Sho Deep Impact Kinen
(Japanese 2000 Guineas Trial)
1-0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Mainichi Hai 0-2-0-6 0% 25.0% 25.0%
Anemone Stakes 0-1-0-1 0% 50.0% 50.0%
Note: Only races that produced Top 3 finishers in the NHK Mile Cup are shown.
Note: Churchill Downs Cup (NHK Mile Cup Trial) data includes Arlington Cup data.

Runners narrowly beaten last time out bounce back
Looking at performances by runners over the last 10 years in terms of finish and time difference with the winner in their previous race, we find that runners that had won their previous race struggled with a Top 3 ratio of just 5.3%. Runners that achieved strong results were those that had been narrowly beaten in their previous race with a time difference of 0.4 seconds or less from the winner. Runners that had been beaten by 0.5 seconds or more also performed poorly, so we should select the main contenders from among runners that finished 2nd or lower last time out with a time difference of 0.4 seconds or less from the winner. [Table 4]

[Table 4] Performance by finish and time difference with winner in previous race (last 10 years)
Finish and time difference
with winner in previous race
Performance
[1st-2nd-3rd-4th or lower]
Win ratio Top 2 ratio Top 3 ratio
1st 1-0-1-36 2.6% 2.6% 5.3%
2nd or lower, time difference of 0.4s or less 9-7-6-47 13.0% 23.2% 31.9%
2nd or lower, time difference of 0.5s or more 0-3-3-65 0% 4.2% 8.5%

Check performance in the debut and second race
The last 10 winners had all secured a victory in their debut race. In addition, seven of the 10 winners had won their second race. It is worth noting that runners with this profile have produced the winner in each of the last five years. [Table 5]

[Table 5] Winners’ performance in debut and second race (last 10 years)
Year Winner Performance in debut and second race
2016 Major Emblem Debut race 1st → Aster Sho 1st
2017 Aerolithe Debut race 1st → Saffron Sho 2nd
2018 Keiai Nautique Debut race 1st → Daily Hai Nisai Stakes 3rd
2019 Admire Mars Debut race 1st → Chukyo Nisai Stakes 1st
2020 Lauda Sion Debut race 1st → Kokura Nisai Stakes 3rd
2021 Schnell Meister Debut race 1st → Hiiragi Sho 1st
2022 Danon Scorpion Debut race 1st → Hagi Stakes 1st
2023 Champagne Color Debut race 1st → Begonia Sho 1st
2024 Jantar Mantar Debut race 1st → Daily Hai Nisai Stakes 1st
2025 Panja Tower Debut race 1st → Keio Hai Nisai Stakes 1st

 

(Yodohito Himezono)

NHK Mile Cup related contents